Developersummit
  • HOME
  • SPEAKERS
  • SESSIONS
  • BUY TICKETS
  • CONTACT
saltmarch

GIDS news media, articles, insights and virtual events educate and illuminate its audiences so they can be fully prepared to deal with the new realities at work and in their professions.

Saltmarch On-Demand
Media

Our Experts

Videos On Demand

Insights

Call for Papers

Connect

About Us

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions

Code of Conduct

Contact Us

Subscribe to Developersummit

Get the latest event updates, and insights from today's leading voices.

© 2026-2027 Saltmarch. All rights reserved.

When RCA Agents Drown in Context
RegisterTwitterLinkedInFacebook

< session />

When RCA Agents Drown in Context

Thu, December 10Production AI SystemsAgents, Context & Execution

Root cause analysis is one of the most challenging workloads for AI agents. When an incident occurs in a production system, the natural instinct is to gather every log, metric, trace, deployment event, and configuration change, then allow the model to reason over the complete dataset. That was our approach, and it failed.

Token consumption became unpredictable, investigation latency increased, context windows were exhausted, and the agent confidently pursued incorrect root causes. What initially appeared to be a context management problem turned out to be a much deeper engineering mistake.

We were treating investigation as an act of reasoning instead of an engineered workflow.

This session explores how redesigning the investigation process changed the behaviour of our RCA agent. Rather than optimising prompts or expanding context windows, we treated investigation as an engineered workflow. The agent progressively acquired evidence, eliminated competing hypotheses, controlled its search space, and justified why one explanation was stronger than another before continuing the investigation.

Using real production failures, investigation traces, OpenTelemetry metrics, and execution telemetry, the session demonstrates how this approach produced more reliable root cause identification, fewer hallucinations, shorter investigations, and behaviour that engineering teams could understand and trust. The focus is not on providing more context to the model, but on designing investigation workflows that guide how evidence is gathered and evaluated.

What You Will Learn:

  • Why providing more context can reduce the effectiveness of AI-driven root cause analysis
  • How incremental evidence gathering and hypothesis refinement improve investigation workflows
  • Practical lessons from production incidents using investigation traces, telemetry, and operational data

Who Should Attend:

  • AI engineers
  • Platform engineers
  • SREs and reliability engineers
  • Observability engineers
  • Staff and principal engineers
  • Technical leads responsible for incident response
  • Teams building AI-assisted operational tooling

< speaker_info />

About the speaker

Vipin Menon

Vipin Menon

Level 3 Engineer IBM Software Labs

Vipin Menon is a Level 3 Engineer for Java with IBM Software Labs. His expertise is in debugging, problem determination for the Java class library components like JAX, ORB, util, Installers, security and many more. He has been working closely with several open source projects like swift and node with significant contributions to API development in swift and development of several community initiated proposals in node. He has been a speaker in GIDS 2019 and several meetups.

Related Talks

Production-Ready Agents: A Live Architecture Workshop

Thu, December 10

Production-Ready Agents: A Live Architecture Workshop

Tuhin Sharma, Soham Dutta
When Healthy Agents Fail: 12 Patterns from Production

Wed, December 9

When Healthy Agents Fail: 12 Patterns from Production

Tuhin Sharma, Soham Dutta
Operating Agentic Systems in Production: Evaluation, Observability, and Runtime Control

Thu, December 10

Operating Agentic Systems in Production: Evaluation, Observability, and Runtime Control

Nicole Koenigstein